Written by Steve Kennedy, MAA Books Beat is a column written for MAA FOCUS. Playing to Learn Game Theory appears in the June/July 2014 issue.
Playing to Learn Game Theory
by Steve Kennedy
Suppose the graph depicted in figure 1 represents a network
of communities. Two doctors are planning to set up practice in one of the nine
communities. A practice will attract all the patients in every town closest to
it (closest means in terms of number of graph edges joining the vertices). In
the case of a distance tie, each doctor will attract half the patients in the
town. Where should the doctors locate to ensure their best result? (They are
not conspiring; each doctor is acting independently and in ignorance of the
other’s choice.)
Of course, neither doctor, presumably desiring to maximize
her practice, would choose one of the degree-two vertices. The other six
vertices look equally valuable. Suppose Doctor A chooses vertex 2. Were Doctor
B to choose any of vertices 3, 5, or 8, each doctor would get 4.5 towns’ worth
of business. If Doctor B chooses vertex 6, she “wins” by gaining five towns to
A’s four. (If she chooses vertex 7, the payoffs are reversed and A wins five to
four.)
If we conceive of the competition as a game between the two
doctors, then this game has no Nash equilibrium. Each doctor can guarantee
herself only four-ninths of the available customers.
The example comes from the new MAA ebook, Game Theory through Examples by Erich
Prisner. The Doctor Locator Game is one of scores of clever, rich, interesting
games described and analyzed in this lively text. There are also scores of
apps, linked to the etext, so that the reader can play the games, the best way
to understand them. In the doctor game, the reader can, with two mouse clicks,
choose vertices to represent the doctors’ choices and immediately see a
color-coded graph giving the division and the count.
The example games
introduce and exposit all the important concepts of game theory. The Doctor
Locator Game, on a different graph, introduces the idea of a Nash equilibrium
and explains how to find one. The obvious next question of their existence is
answered by the above example.
